10.8 Spotlight Application
Case Study
An 85-year-old woman was admitted with sudden onset of dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, and right upper arm edema. She had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placed three weeks previously for treatment of osteomyelitis of the left hand. A caretaker had been infusing her antibiotics and managing her PICC with the oversight of a home care nurse. A chest computerized tomography scan confirmed the presence of a pulmonary embolism. She was admitted to the inpatient floor at change of shift, and orders were received for a weight-based heparin bolus and infusion. The bolus was administered, and the infusion was initiated. During report to the next shift, the pump alarm sounded. In responding to the alarm, the oncoming primary nurse discovered that the entire bag of heparin (25,000 units) had infused in less than 30 minutes. She discovered that the rate on the pump was set by the previous nurse at 600 mL/hour rather than the weight-adjusted 600 units/hour.
The primary nurse who discovered the heparin error immediately disconnected the infusion, assessed the client for signs of bleeding, and notified the physician of the error. Appropriate precautions were enacted. She later filed an incident report. The subsequent investigation was conducted by the unit supervisor and the risk manager by interviewing involved staff. They found that the client’s admitting nurse, who administered the heparin bolus and infusion, was a traveling nurse who had been in the organization for three weeks and had been floated to the telemetry unit for the first time. She had been trained on an orthopedic unit and had not initiated a heparin infusion at this facility. She had not been assigned a buddy on the unit, and because there had been several admissions and dismissals that shift, she became increasingly frustrated with the pace. The facility used an infusion pump that included a drug library with medication-specific infusion limits for client safety. She had been trained to use the infusion pump drug library in a brief orientation, but she had witnessed several nurses bypass this safety measure. In addition, although she had her heparin bolus and infusion calculations double-checked by another nurse, she was not aware and was not prompted that this double-check included review of pump settings. Finally, because of the influx of clients, change of shift report was hurried and did not include a bedside report to review infusions and client status with the oncoming nurse. What appeared to be a serious individual error was in fact a complex series of failures in the facility’s safety culture that placed a nurse in the very difficult position of making an error that placed a client at risk of harm. Fortunately, no significant bleeding events occurred as a result of the error.
The heparin administration scenario demonstrates the threat to client safety when attitudes about safety are relaxed and actions designed to promote safety are circumvented.[1]
- Sherwood, G., & Nickel, B. (2017) Integrating quality and safety competencies to improve outcomes: Application in infusion therapy practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 40(2), 116-122 https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000210 ↵