5.2 Understanding the Legal System

Understanding the Legal System

There are several types of laws and regulations that affect nursing practice. Laws are rules and regulations created by a society and enforced by courts and professional licensure boards. Nurses are responsible for being aware of public and private laws that affect client care, as well as legal actions that can result when these laws are broken.

Laws are generally classified as public or private law. Public law governs relationships between the government and private persons or institutions, whereas private law governs the relationships between private parties.

Public Law

There are several types of public law, including constitutional, statutory, administrative, and criminal law.

  • Constitutional law refers to the rights, privileges, and responsibilities established by the U.S. Constitution.[1] The right to privacy is an example of a patient right based on constitutional law.
  • Statutory law is laws established by the legislature and formally written and enacted. For example, the Nurse Practice Act in each state is an example of statutory law enacted by that state’s legislature. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is an example of a federal statutory law. HIPAA required the creation of national standards to protect sensitive client health information from being disclosed without the client’s consent or knowledge.
  • Administrative law is law created by government agencies that have been granted the authority to establish rules and regulations to protect the public.[2] An example of federal administrative law is the regulations set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). OSHA was established by Congress to ensure safe and healthy working conditions for employees by setting and enforcing federal standards. An example of administrative law at the state level is the State Board of Nursing (SBON). The SBON is a group of individuals in each state, established by that state’s legislature, to enforce the Nurse Practice Act. The SBON issues licenses to qualified candidates and enforces laws pertaining to nursing practice by investigating reports of misconduct and implementing a disciplinary process.
  • Criminal law is a system of laws concerned with punishment of individuals who commit crimes.[3] A crime is a behavior defined by Congress or state legislature as deserving of punishment. Crimes are classified as felonies, misdemeanors, and infractions. Conviction for a crime requires evidence to show the defendant is guilty beyond a shadow of doubt. This means the prosecution must convince a jury there is no reasonable explanation other than guilty that can come from the evidence presented at trial. In the United States, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. See Figure 5.1[4] for an illustration of a trial with a jury.
Illustration depicting a jury trial
Figure 5.1 Trial by Jury

Serious crimes that can result in imprisonment for longer than one year are called felonies. Felony convictions can also result in the loss of voting rights, the ability to own or use guns, and the loss of one’s nursing license. An example of a felony committed by some nurses is drug diversion of controlled substances.

Misdemeanors are less serious crimes resulting in penalties of fines and/or imprisonment for less than one year. For example, in Wisconsin, misdemeanors are categorized as Class A, B, or C based on their sentencing. Class A misdemeanors are sentenced to a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed nine months. Class B misdemeanors are sentenced to a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or both. Class C misdemeanors are sentenced to a fine not to exceed $500 or imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, or both.[5] Examples of misdemeanors include battery, possession of controlled substances, petty theft, disorderly conduct, and driving under the influence (DUI) charges. Although considered less serious crimes, misdemeanors can impact an individual’s ability to obtain or maintain a nursing license.

Nurses who are found guilty of misdemeanors or felonies, regardless if the violation is related to the practice of nursing, must typically report these violations to their state’s Board of Nursing.

Infractions are minor offenses, such as speeding tickets, that result in fines but not jail time. Infractions do not generally impact nursing licensure unless there is a significant quantity of them over a short period of time.

Sample Case

An LPN working for a hospice agency was accused of stealing a patient’s pain medications and substituting them with anti-seizure medication. The family asserted the actions of the LPN prolonged the patient’s suffering. The LPN served time in prison for diverting the patient’s medications.[6]

Private Law

Private law, also referred to as civil law, focuses on the rights, responsibilities, and legal relationships between private citizens. Civil law typically involves compensation to the injured party. Unlike criminal law that requires a jury to determine a defendant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt, civil law only requires a certainty of guilt of greater than 50 percent.[7] See Figure 5.2[8] for an illustration of balancing the evidence to determine the certainty of guilt. Any nurse can be impacted by civil law based on actions occurring in daily nursing practice.

 

Image showing balancing scales
Figure 5.2 Balancing the Evidence to Determine Guilt

Civil law includes contract law and tort law. Contracts are binding written, verbal, or implied agreements. A tort is an action or omission that gives rise to injury or harm to another and amounts to a civil wrong for which courts impose liability. In the context of torts, “injury” describes the invasion of any legal right, whereas “harm” describes a loss or detriment that an individual suffers.[9]

Two categories of torts affect nursing practice, intentional torts, such as intentionally hitting a person, and unintentional torts (also referred to as negligent torts), such as causing an error by failing to follow agency policy.

Intentional Torts

Intentional torts are wrongs that the defendant knew (or should have known) would be caused by their actions. Examples of intentional torts include assault, battery, false imprisonment, slander, libel, and breach of privacy or client confidentiality.

Unintentional Torts

Unintentional torts occur when the defendant’s actions or inactions were unreasonably unsafe. Unintentional torts can result from acts of commission (i.e., doing something a reasonable nurse would not have done) or omission (i.e., failing to do something a reasonable nurse would do).[10]

Negligence and malpractice are examples of unintentional torts. Tort law exists to compensate clients injured by negligent practice, provide corrective judgement, and deter negligence with visible consequences of action or inaction.[11],[12] Examples of common torts affecting nursing practice are discussed in further detail in the following subsections. See Table 5.2 for a comparison of public and private law.

Table 5.2 Comparison of Public and Private Law

Type of Law Subtypes of Law and Examples
Public Law
  • Statutory law (Nurse Practice Act and HIPAA)
  • Constitutional law (Right to Privacy)
  • Administrative law (State Boards of Nursing and OSHA)
  • Criminal law (felonies and misdemeanors)
Private Law (Civil Law)
  • Contract law
    • Written
    • Verbal
    • Implied
  • Tort law
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Confidentiality
    • Consent
    • False imprisonment
    • Fraud
    • Negligence
    • Malpractice

Examples of Intentional and Unintentional Torts

Assault and Battery

Assault and battery are intentional torts. Assault is defined as intentionally putting another person in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.[13] Battery is defined as intentional causation of harmful or offensive contact with another person without that person’s consent.[14] Physical harm does not need to occur to be charged with assault or battery. Battery convictions are often misdemeanors but can be felonies if serious bodily harm occurs. To avoid the risk of being charged with assault or battery, nurses must obtain consent from clients to provide hands-on care.

False Imprisonment

False imprisonment is an intentional tort. False imprisonment is defined as an act of restraining another person and causing that person to be confined in a bounded area.[15]In nursing practice, restraints can be physical, chemical, or verbal. Nurses must strictly follow agency policies related to the use of restraints. Physical restraints typically require a provider order and documentation according to strict guidelines within specific time frames. See Figure 5.3[16] for an image of a simulated client in full physical medical restraints.

Chemical restraints include administering medications such as benzodiazepines and require clear documentation supporting their use. Verbal threats to keep an individual in an inpatient environment can also qualify as false imprisonment and should be avoided.

 

Photo showing simulated patient in restraints
Figure 5.3 Physical Restraints

Breach of Privacy and Confidentiality

Breaching privacy and confidentiality are intentional torts. Confidentiality is the right of an individual to have personal, identifiable medical information, referred to as protected health information (PHI), kept private. Protected Health Information (PHI) is defined as individually-identifiable health information including demographic data that relates to the individual’s past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition[17]; the provision of health care to the individual; and the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to the individual.

This right is protected by federal regulations called the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA was enacted in 1996 and was prompted by the need to ensure privacy and protection of personal health records and data in an environment of electronic medical records and third-party insurance payers. There are two main sections of HIPAA law: the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule. The Privacy Rule addresses the use and disclosure of individuals’ health information. The Security Rule sets national standards for protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronically protected health information. HIPAA regulations extend beyond medical records and apply to client information shared with others. Therefore, all types of client information should be shared only with health care team members who are actively providing care to them.[18],[19]

HIPAA violations may result in fines from $100 for an individual violation to $1.5 million for organizational violations. Criminal penalties, including jail time of up to ten years, may be imposed for violations involving the use of PHI for personal gain or malicious intent. Nursing students are also required to adhere to HIPAA guidelines from the moment they begin to provide client care or risk being disciplined or expelled by their nursing program.

Sample Case

An RN accessed a patient’s medical records, as well as the records of the newborn son, although she was not assigned to their care because she believed the child was her biological grandchild. Although the chart was accessed for less than five seconds, it was unauthorized. The nurse was publicly reprimanded by the state’s Board of Nursing and her multistate licensure privileges were revoked. Expenses to defend the nurse exceeded $2,800.[20]

Read more about the HIPAA Privacy Rule.

Slander and Libel

Slander and libel are intentional torts. Defamation of character occurs when an individual makes negative, malicious, and false remarks about another person to damage their reputation. Slander is spoken defamation and libel is written defamation. Nurses must take care to communicate and document facts regarding patient care without defamation in their oral and written communications with clients and coworkers.

Fraud

Fraud is an intentional tort. Fraud occurs when an individual is deceived for personal gain. An example of fraud is financial exploitation perpetrated by individuals who are in positions of trust.[21],[22] A nurse may be charged with fraud for documenting interventions not performed or altering documentation to cover up an error. Fraud can result in civil and criminal charges and also suspension or revocation of a nurse’s license.

Negligence and Malpractice

Negligence and malpractice are types of unintentional torts. Negligence is the failure to exercise the ordinary care a reasonable person would use in similar circumstances. Wisconsin civil jury instruction states, “A person is not using ordinary care and is negligent, if the person, without intending to do harm, does something (or fails to do something) that a reasonable person would recognize as creating an unreasonable risk of injury or damage to a person or property.”[23]  Malpractice is a specific term used for negligence committed by a professional with a license. See Figure 5.4[24] for an illustration related to malpractice.

 

Image showing gavel and a sign reading malpractice
Figure 5.4 Malpractice

Elements of Nursing Malpractice

Nurses and nursing students don’t often get sued for malpractice, but when they do, it is important to understand the elements required to prove malpractice. All of the following elements must be established in a court of law to prove malpractice:[25]

  • Duty: A nurse-client relationship exists.
  • Breach: The standard of care was not met and harm was a foreseeable consequence of the action or inaction.
  • Cause: Injury was caused by the nurse’s breach.
  • Harm: Injury resulted in damages.

Parties bringing a lawsuit must be able to demonstrate their interests were harmed, providing a reason to stand before the court. The person bringing the lawsuit is called the plaintiff. The parties named in the lawsuit are called defendants. Most malpractice lawsuits name physicians or hospitals, although nurses can be individually named. Employers can be held liable for the actions of their employees.[26]

Malpractice lawsuits are concerned with the legal obligations nurses have to their patients to adhere to current standards of practice. These legal obligations are referred to as the duty of reasonable care. Nurses are required to adhere to standards of practice when providing care to patients they have been assigned. This includes following organizational policies and procedures, maintaining clinical competency, and confining their activities to the authorized scope of practice as defined by their state’s Nurse Practice Act. Nurses also have a legal duty to be physically, mentally, and morally fit for practice. When nurses do not meet these professional obligations, they are said to have breached their duties to patients.[27]

Duty

In the work environment, a duty is created when the nurse accepts responsibility for a patient and establishes a nurse-patient relationship. This generally occurs during inpatient care upon acceptance of a handoff report from another nurse. Outside the work environment, a nurse-patient relationship is created when the nurse volunteers services. Some states have statutes that impose a duty to render assistance to people in need (also referred to as a Good Samaritan Law), notifying authorities (also referred to as mandatory reporting), or summoning assistance.[28]

Good Samaritan Law

The Good Samaritan Law provides protections against negligence claims to individuals who render aid to people experiencing medical emergencies outside of clinical environments. All 50 states in the United States have a version of a Good Samaritan Law. See Figure 5.5[29] for artwork depicting a Good Samaritan. Differences exist in state laws regarding who is protected, so it is important to review the law in states where a nurse practices or visits. Although there is generally no legal duty for health care providers to render aid outside of their professional roles, it is considered a moral obligation to utilize one’s training voluntarily in emergency situations.

Although the majority of Good Samaritan Laws are at the state level, the federal Aviation Medical Assistance Act (AMAA) provides liability protection for aid given on aircraft. The most common in-flight medical emergencies involve syncope, as well as gastrointestinal, respiratory, and cardiac events.[30] Note that consent for care by an unconscious person is implied, but consent must be obtained from alert individuals.

 

Image showing the Good Samaritan art work
5.5 Good Samaritan

Mandatory Reporting

Nurses are legally responsible for reporting certain crimes. Mandatory reporting requirements vary based on the state of practice, but there are some commonalities. For example, nurses are mandated to report suspected abuse of children, the elderly, and the disabled (if they have been deemed as incompetent by a court of law or as incapacitated by qualified health care providers).

Nurses are also mandated to report gunshot wounds, dog bites, some communicable diseases, and unsafe or illegal practices of other health care team members. Reporting responsibility often begins at the organizational level. The nurse may also need to identify the appropriate local, state, or federal authorities to submit the report and pursue it to its resolution.

Sample Statute Regarding Duty to Assist

A Minnesota statute states that a person at the scene of an emergency who knows that another person is exposed to or has suffered grave physical harm shall, to the extent that the person can do so without danger or peril to self or others, give reasonable assistance to the exposed person. Reasonable assistance may include obtaining or attempting to obtain aid from law enforcement or medical personnel. A person who violates this is guilty of a petty misdemeanor.[31]

Implications for Nurses[32]

Duty can be established in many ways. Nurses have a duty of reasonable care for a patient they have been assigned. They may also have a duty in other circumstances. Therefore, nurses should understand the following:

  • Recognize that a nurse-patient relationship is established upon acceptance of responsibility for a patient, whether after a handoff report in the workplace or during volunteered services.
  • Assume that on-call or supervisory responsibilities create a duty to patients, even in the absence of an expressed nurse-patient relationship.
  • Know if there is a duty to rescue statute in their state, and if so, what it demands.

Breach of Duty

After a plaintiff has established the first element in a malpractice suit, that the nurse owed a duty to the plaintiff, the plaintiff must then demonstrate that the nurse breached that duty by failing to comply with the duty of reasonable care.[33] See Figure 5.6[34] for an illustration related to breach of duty.

 

Image showing a gavel on top a document that reads Affiliate Disclosure
Figure 5.6 Breach of Duty

To demonstrate that a nurse breached their duty to a patient, the plaintiff must prove the nurse departed from acceptable standards of practice. The plaintiff must establish how a reasonably prudent nurse in the same or similar circumstances would act and then show that the defendant nurse departed from that standard of practice. The plaintiff must claim the nurse did something a reasonably prudent nurse would not have done (an act of commission) or failed to do something a reasonable nurse would have done (an act of omission).[35]

Experts are needed during court hearings to explain things outside the knowledge of non-nurse jurors. In reaching their opinions, experts review many materials, including the state’s Nurse Practice Act and organizational policies, to determine whether the nurse adhered to them. To qualify as a nurse expert, the person testifying must have relevant experience, education, skill, and knowledge. They typically have advanced degrees, are published in nursing literature, have spoken at professional conferences, and belong to professional organizations. Medical malpractice trials take place primarily in state courts, so experts are deemed qualified based on state requirements.

Sample Case Regarding Breach of Duty[36]

Mary Jones was an 87-year-old woman who presented to the hospital with dizziness, nausea, intermittent slurred speech, an unsteady gait, and a history of four falls at home that day. Significant medical history included heart disease and multiple medications. The admitting nurse assessed her as being at risk for falls and placed her on universal fall precautions. The fall precautions included keeping the bed in the lowest position, instructing her on the use of the call light and ensuring the call light was within her reach, providing a bedside commode, and placing her in a room close to the nurses’ station where she could be observed. However, the nurse did not use a formal scoring system for fall risk assessment that was set forth in a nursing procedures textbook. Additionally, bed alarms had not been working at this agency for a year.

Five days later, a nurse responded to a sound coming from Mrs. Jones’s room and found her lying on the bathroom floor. She was conscious and able to move all extremities but complained of left knee and elbow pain. The physician was notified, and Mrs. Jones was sent for X-rays and a CT scan. When Mrs. Jones returned to her room, the nurse observed she was diaphoretic and deteriorating. The nurse took Mrs. Jones to the emergency department, where she lost consciousness. She was evaluated by a neurosurgeon, intubated, and airlifted to a different hospital for a higher level of care. She never regained consciousness and died the next day from intracranial bleeding that was aggravated by anticoagulant therapy.

Mrs. Jones’s estate brought a lawsuit alleging nursing malpractice. The estate’s nursing expert stated the universal fall precautions had been inadequate for a high-risk patient and additional measures should have been instituted. The expert testified that not only had the admitting nurse not adhered to the formal scoring system for fall risk assessment in the nursing procedures textbook, but also the standard of care required nurses to use bed alarms, institute 15-minute rounds, or place a sitter in the room.

A defense expert used The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals to define the standard of care and testified it was her opinion the nurse had met that standard. The organizational policy did not require bed alarms as part of its fall prevention plan. Although the nurses did not use the formal scoring system in a textbook to assess the patient’s risk, they clearly identified her as being at risk for falling; assessed her frequently; maintained her bed in the lowest position; kept the wheels of her bed locked and her side rails up; and kept the call bell within her reach. They instructed her on the use of the call bell and placed her in a room where she could be readily observed.

The court entered the judgment for the defendant hospital, noting that “under the circumstances, it is a close call on whether the hospital, by not having functioning bed alarms and staff not checking on Mary more frequently, breached the standard of care.”[37] In this case, the plaintiff’s expert had not demonstrated the standard of care was breached.

Implications for Nurses [38]

Nurses defending themselves against allegations of professional malpractice must demonstrate their actions conformed with accepted standards of practice. They must convince a jury they acted as a reasonably prudent nurse would have in the same or similar circumstances. Nurses should always follow these practices:

  • Adhere to organizational policies and procedures. Work-arounds can create liability. The standard of practice is to adhere to agency policy. Failing to do so creates an assumption of departure from standards.
  • Document in a manner that permits accurate reconstruction of patient assessments and the sequence of events, especially when notifying providers regarding clinical concerns.
  • Maintain competence through continuing education, participation in professional conferences, membership in professional organizations, and subscriptions to professional journals.
  • When using an interpreter, ensure that properly trained interpreters are used and document the name of the interpreter. The use of family, friends, or other untrained interpreters is unsafe practice and is not consistent with acceptable standards of practice.
  • Maintain professional boundaries. Personal relationships with patients or their families can be red flags for juries and can be viewed as evidence of departure from professional standards.

Cause

After the plaintiff has established the nurse owed a duty to a patient and then breached that duty, they must then demonstrate that damages or harm were caused by that breach. Plaintiffs cannot prevail by only demonstrating the nurse departed from acceptable standards of practice, but must also prove that such departures were the cause of any injuries.[39] Additionally, nurses are held accountable for foreseeability, meaning a nurse of ordinary skill, care, and diligence could anticipate the risk of harm of departing from standards of practice in similar circumstances.[40]

Plaintiffs must be able to link the defendant’s acts or omissions to the harm for which they are seeking compensation. This requires expert testimony from a physician because it requires a medical diagnosis. Unlike in criminal cases, in which the standard of proof is that elements of prosecution must be proven “beyond reasonable doubt,” the elements of malpractice lawsuit must be proven by a “preponderance of evidence.” Expert testimony is required to demonstrate “medical certainty” that the nurse’s breach was the cause of an actual injury.

Sample Cases Regarding Causation

Case 1

Janusz Osiecki was admitted to a subacute nursing facility to recover from Guillain-Barre syndrome. Required nursing care included respiratory assessments and tracheostomy care. One morning, three weeks into his stay, he was found unresponsive, without pulse or respirations. His wife brought a wrongful death lawsuit, and expert witnesses testified the nurses breached the standard of care in not performing respiratory and tracheostomy assessments every two hours. Their rationale was that the purpose of the assessments was to detect and report pulmonary congestion, and if the nurses had done so in a timely manner, Mr. Osiecki could have received medical care that would have saved his life. A jury awarded the widow $577,005 for wrongful death and $250,000 for harm to family relationships.[41]

Case 2

A psychiatric patient identified as “C” was locked in a seclusion room after presenting to a hospital with psychosis and continuing bizarre behavior, hallucinations, irrationality, lack of contact with reality, and agitation. She was in the seclusion room undergoing treatment for over a week when she suffered a grand mal seizure. A psychiatrist ordered antipsychotic medication. However, the nurses did not note the order until the next day. They then discovered the medication was unavailable at the pharmacy. However, they did not notify the psychiatrist so that another medication could be ordered, and C went without antipsychotic medication for three days. The nurses also did not notify the psychiatrist during those three days that C was becoming increasingly more agitated and hallucinating. On the fourth day, C attempted to leave the unit and told staff she was hearing voices instructing her to harm herself. She was returned to seclusion and remained there without being assessed or treated. Four hours later, she was found with her head wedged between the side rail and the mattress. She was unconscious and without vital signs. C suffered brain damage that left her in a permanent semicomatose state.

C’s estate brought a lawsuit alleging it was negligent to leave C in a steel bed in a seclusion room without constant observation. The jury awarded $3.6 million. The hospital appealed, but the appellate court upheld the jury verdict and explained that particular injuries do not need to be foreseen, only the general harm that can occur. The court stated, “It is not extraordinary that a psychotic patient who is delusional…might wedge herself between a mattress and side rail in an attempt to hurt herself.”[42]

Implications for Nurses[43]

Nurses can reduce their liability by adhering to professional standards and documenting their observations and communications. Nurses should always follow these standards:

  • Follow the chain of command when there are concerns about unclear or potentially unsafe orders. Pursue concerns to resolution, documenting precisely who is notified and at what times.
  • Document observations to justify clinical decisions. Variance charting (i.e., only charting things that vary from the norm) does not provide sufficient evidence of compliance with the standards of care.
  • Adhere to organizational policies and procedures with an understanding that a failure to do so creates foreseeable harm to patients.

Harm

In a civil lawsuit, after a plaintiff has established the nurse owed a duty to the patient, breached that duty, and harm was caused as a result of that breach, they must prove injuries to be awarded damages. They are asking for repayment for what they have lost.[44]

There are several types of injuries for which patients or their representatives seek compensation. Injuries can be physical, emotional, financial, professional, marital, or any combination of these. Physical injuries include loss of function, disfigurement, physical or mental impairment, exacerbation of prior medical problems, the need for additional medical care, and death. Economic injuries can include lost wages, additional medical expenses, rehabilitation, durable medical expenses, the need for architectural changes to one’s home, the loss of earning capacity, the need to hire people to do things the plaintiff can no longer do, and the loss of financial support. Emotional injuries can include psychological damage, emotional distress, or other forms of mental suffering.[45]

Determining the specific amount a plaintiff needs can require expert witness testimony from a person known as a life care planner who is trained in analyzing and evaluating medical costs, as well as the subjective determination of a jury. Damages fall into several categories, including compensatory (economic) damages, noneconomic damages, and punitive damages.[46] See Figure 5.7[47] for an illustration of damages.

 

Image showing eye glasses, pen, and paper money on top of a clipboard with paper that states Damages
Figure 5.7 Damages

Economic damages (also referred to as actual damages) can be quantified. They are intended to restore the plaintiff to the position they were in before being injured. Compensatory damages are objectively calculated to provide the plaintiff with the amount of money necessary to replace what was lost.[48]

Noneconomic damages are subjective and can include things such as emotional distress, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, reputation damage, loss of companionship, or loss of parental guidance. They are more difficult to quantify than economic damages.[49]

Punitive damages are awards not related to the actual injury but are intended to punish the defendant(s) and deter others from engaging in similar conduct. In professional malpractice cases, punitive damages are difficult for plaintiffs to obtain because they must be related to outrageous conduct, such as gross negligence, recklessness, willful actions, or fraud.[50]

Sample Case Related to Damages[51]

Betty Shiflett fell out of bed in the recovery room after undergoing knee surgery. Three days later, she reported a clicking sound and pain in her knee to one of the nurses. Although the nurse documented these symptoms, she did not convey the information to the physician. A physical therapist reported these symptoms to the physician a week later. The physician then identified a previously undiagnosed nondisplaced left tibial fracture that was now avulsed. Two additional surgeries were unsuccessful, and Betty remained disabled, confined to a wheelchair, and in chronic pain.

Betty and her husband filed a lawsuit alleging negligence for the fall and the nurse’s failure to report the symptoms to the physician. They also asserted a claim for a loss of consortium, meaning the spouse or family had also been harmed. The harm suffered is a loss of companionship, conjugal relations, support and services, or marital quality. The jury awarded total damages of $2,391,620 with the following breakdown:

  • $791,620 for future medical expenses
  • $800,000 for past noneconomic damages
  • $500,000 for future noneconomic damages
  • $300,000 for loss of consortium

Implications for Nurses[52]

Nurses can reduce their liability exposure by following these principles:

  • Practicing according to current standards of practice.
  • Maintaining professional liability insurance to provide coverage for events and licensure defense.
  • Avoiding work-arounds or deviations from organizational policies and procedures.
  • Maintaining clinical competency, including awareness of standard-of-practice changes.
  • Engaging the chain of command with patient concerns and pursuing concerns to resolution.
  • Documenting in a manner that permits accurate reconstruction of patient assessments, notification of others, and the sequence of events.
  1. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  2. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  3. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  4. “Courtroom Trial with Judge, Jury - Vector Image” designed by WannaPik is licensed under CC0 ↵
  5. Wisconsin State Legislature. (2021). 939.51 Classification of misdemeanors. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/iv/51 ↵
  6. Nurses Service Organization and CAN Financial. (2020, June). Nurse professional liability exposure claim report (4th ed.). https://www.nso.com/Learning/Artifacts/Claim-Reports/Minimizing-Risk-Achieving-Excellence ↵
  7. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  8. "Balance Scales (Ethics)" by The Open University (OU) is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 ↵
  9. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  10. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 2: Breach. American Journal of Nursing, 119(9), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000580256.10914.2e ↵
  11. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  12. Mello, M. M., Frakes, M. D., Blumenkranz, E., & Studdert, D. M. (2020). Malpractice liability and health care quality: A review. JAMA, 323(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.21411 ↵
  13. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  14. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  15. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.) Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu ↵
  16. “PinelRestaint.jpg” by James Heilman, MD is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 ↵
  17. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2013, July 26). Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html ↵
  18. Nursing Fundamentals by Chippewa Valley Technical College is licensed under CC BY 4.0 ↵
  19. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2013, July 26). Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html ↵
  20. Nurses Service Organization and CAN Financial. (2020, June). Nurse professional liability exposure claim report (4th ed.). https://www.nso.com/Learning/Artifacts/Claim-Reports/Minimizing-Risk-Achieving-Excellence ↵
  21. DeLiema, M. (2018). Elder fraud and financial exploitation: Application of routine activity theory. The Gerontologist, 58(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw258 ↵
  22. DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2020). Financial fraud among older Americans: Evidence and implications. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(4), 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby151 ↵
  23. Wis. JI—Civil 1005. (2016). https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/civil/instruction.php?n=1005 ↵
  24. “malpractice.jpg” by Nick Youngson hosted by Pix4free is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↵
  25. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 1: Duty. American Journal of Nursing, 119(7), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000569476.17357.f5 ↵
  26. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 1: Duty. American Journal of Nursing, 119(7), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000569476.17357.f5 ↵
  27. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 1: Duty. American Journal of Nursing, 119(7), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000569476.17357.f5 ↵
  28. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 1: Duty. American Journal of Nursing, 119(7), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000569476.17357.f5 ↵
  29. “The_good_samaritan_helping_a_stranger_who_has_been_ignored_b_Wellcome_V0015249.jpg” by S. Smith after C. L. Eastlake is licensed under CC BY 4.0 ↵
  30. This work is a derivative of StatPearls by West and Varacallo and is licensed under CC BY 4.0 ↵
  31. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 1: Duty. American Journal of Nursing, 119(7), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000569476.17357.f5 ↵
  32. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 1: Duty. American Journal of Nursing, 119(7), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000569476.17357.f5 ↵
  33. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 2: Breach. American Journal of Nursing, 119(9), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000580256.10914.2e ↵
  34. “Affiliate disclosure.png” by Nick Youngson hosted by Pix4free is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↵
  35. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 2: Breach. American Journal of Nursing, 119(9), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000580256.10914.2e ↵
  36. Mello, M. M., Frakes, M. D., Blumenkranz, E., & Studdert, D. M. (2020). Malpractice liability and health care quality: A review. JAMA, 323(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.21411 ↵
  37. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 2: Breach. American Journal of Nursing, 119(9), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000580256.10914.2e ↵
  38. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 2: Breach. American Journal of Nursing, 119(9), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000580256.10914.2e ↵
  39. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 3A: Causation: A plaintiff must prove not only that a provider departed from acceptable standards of practice--but that this departure caused an injury. American Journal of Nursing, 119(11), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000605380.52689.af ↵
  40. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 3B: Causation. American Journal of Nursing, 120(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000652128.66135.55 ↵
  41. Brous, E. (2019). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 3A: Causation: A plaintiff must prove not only that a provider departed from acceptable standards of practice--but that this departure caused an injury. American Journal of Nursing, 119(11), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000605380.52689.af ↵
  42. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 3B: Causation. American Journal of Nursing, 120(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000652128.66135.55 ↵
  43. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 3B: Causation. American Journal of Nursing, 120(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000652128.66135.55 ↵
  44. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
  45. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
  46. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
  47. “damages.jpg” by Nick Youngson hosted by Pix4free is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↵
  48. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
  49. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
  50. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
  51. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
  52. Brous, E. (2020). The elements of a nursing malpractice case, Part 4: Harm. American Journal of Nursing, 120(3), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000656360.21284.50 ↵
definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Leadership and Management of Nursing Care Copyright © 2022 by Kim Belcik and Open Resources for Nursing is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book